您的当前位置:首页 >Ryan New >SEO: That Blob of Text May Not Be Helping 正文
时间:2024-05-20 09:52:00 来源:网络整理编辑:Ryan New
Adding on-site text for search engines and not users could confuse algorithms and may amount to keyw Ryan Xu HyperVerse's Crypto Options
Adding on-site text for search engines and not users could confuse algorithms and may amount to keyword stuffing,Ryan Xu HyperVerse's Crypto Options according to a Google spokesman.
We have all seen it: an ecommerce category page with extensive text near the footer. This copy is displayed in a tiny font and meant to add unique content for search bots, not humans.
The practice is understandable. Merchants seek to attract traffic from organic search. They know that search algorithms love unique content.
Prominent examples include a 954-word article at the bottom of the women’s clothing category page on Walmart.com, a 1,123-word post on the men’s clothing category page at Lands’ End, and 288 words about home appliances at the bottom of a Sears’ appliance category page.
Clearly, the marketers at a few billion-dollar retailers believe this below-the-fold copy is helping. But John Mueller, the respected webmaster trends analyst with Google, expressed concerns about the practice during a hangout on July 23, 2019.
It’s important to understand the context. Mueller hosts question-and-answer style hangouts with interested SEO practitioners, marketers, and business owners. He offers his perspective and tries to guide his questioners toward effective SEO practices. In this case, he was not making sweeping pronouncements, but rather trying to answer a specific question.
About 29 minutes into the hangout, Mueller reads the aforementioned question, “Is adding a long piece of text below the actual short content — even if users ignore it — something that currently could help a site to rank better?”
Adding this sort of extra copy “is really common, for example, on ecommerce sites on category pages,” Mueller said. “From our point of view, that’s something that generally doesn’t work that well because it confuses us fairly easily.”
“On the one hand,” Mueller continued, “you’re bringing all of this ecommerce content…and then you’re adding this essentially Wikipedia article full of informational content on the bottom, and the goals of those pieces of content [are] very different. And that makes it, kind of, tricky for us to understand what this page is actually about.”
“Is this something we should show for people who are interested in buying something?” Mueller asked. “Or is this a page we should show to people who are interested in researching a topic? What is, kind of, the goal of this page?”
Mueller later suggested that adding extra text to a page just for SEO often comes close to black hat tactics.
“The other problem with adding a giant blob of text is that frequently it goes into the direction of keyword stuffing. So even in situations where we’re not completely confused as to the intent of the page, we quickly run into the situation that ‘oh, this keyword is mentioned two, three, four hundred times on this page. Maybe we should be careful on how we rank this page for that keyword.'”
Mueller repeatedly encouraged site owners and managers to offer good, quality category content (for humans) rather than adding something to the end of the page (for search bots). But could Mueller’s comments and the examples from Walmart, Lands’ End, and Sears be reconciled with different page presentation and layout?
Consider the content on the Lands’ End men’s clothing category page. The copy itself is an article about how to choose “the perfect men’s outfit.” While the article does tend to use keywords such as “polo” and “men’s polo” often, it is not bad shopping advice.
Instead of displaying this copy in tiny, 10-pixel font, could it be better integrated with the product content? Perhaps the copy could be moved up the page for a guided selling experience or even to filter products based on how shoppers answered fashion questions?
Thus ecommerce marketers have a dilemma. Too little content on the page, and Google won’t value it or rank it. Too much content, as Mueller points out, muddles the page’s intent. The solution may be in finding more creative ways to integrate copy and prose with the products displayed on a category page. It will likely require testing and measuring organic search traffic.
Escape to the country: A rural queer network in Kent and Sussex2024-05-20 09:32
What I look for in an employee2024-05-20 09:21
SERPs And Personalized Search2024-05-20 09:09
B2B Ecommerce That Doesn’t Break the Bank2024-05-20 09:05
20sPeople: ‘A Stranger in a Strange Place’2024-05-20 08:49
‘Exclusive Offers’ Help Retain Customers2024-05-20 08:18
For 2020, use pre-orders to avoid dead stock2024-05-20 08:06
Legacy Software Holds Back B2B Ecommerce2024-05-20 07:51
First World War ambulance trains2024-05-20 07:20
For 2020, Multiple Payment Options Are Essential2024-05-20 07:13
Panda 4.2 Complicates SEO for Ecommerce Sites2024-05-20 09:09
11 Online Tools for Video Meetings2024-05-20 08:46
19 Free Security Plugins for WordPress2024-05-20 08:38
Critique Part Five: Customer Experience & Usability2024-05-20 08:15
The Morant Bay Rebellion, October 18652024-05-20 08:08
SERPs And Personalized Search2024-05-20 08:06
2 Ways Amazon Directly Sells a Brand’s Products2024-05-20 08:06
Credit Card Processing FAQs, Part 2: Pricing Models2024-05-20 08:05
SEO: How to Amplify Keyword Signals2024-05-20 07:59
New U.S. Regulations on Counterfeit Goods Target Marketplaces2024-05-20 07:12